The AQC is a 1-item self-report measure of children’s attachment style that is based on Hazan & Shaver’s (1987) single item measure of adult attachment style. The AQ was modified to assess familial and extrafamilial relationships and yields scores on three attachment categories: 1) Secure, 2) Anxious/Ambivalent, and 3) Avoidant. Approximately 30% of subjects overall changed their attachment style classifications over a relatively short time span (ranging from 1 week to several months). Children who experience this type of holding environment grow to feel safe to explore … Below is a list of dissertations using the AAS. Seven of the factors were selected as having sufficient … The 18 items that compromise the measure are as follows: Note: (S)= Secure, (Av)= Avoidant, (Ax)= Anxious/Ambivalent. Having insight regarding different types of attachment can also lead to stronger connections and healthier … Factor analysis was conducted on the seven sub-scales using principal axis extraction. ), Attachment in adults: Clinical and developmental perspectives (pp. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(4), 644-663. Below is a link for an Attachment Style Inventory. The same 9 items are used to assess attachment styles with respect to 4 targets (i.e., mother, father, romantic partner, and best friend). Validation against the Attachment Style Interview: Median scores on the two VASQ subscales were used as cut-off points (>30 for the insecurity scale, >27 for the proximity-seeking scale) for examining VASQ in relation to the vulnerable attachment categories of the ASI. I find it difficult to allow myself to depend on others (Av), People are never there when you need them (Av), I know that others will be there when I need them (S), I find it difficult to trust others completely (Av), I am not sure that I can always depend on others to be there when I need them (Ax), I do not often worry about being abandoned (S), I often worry that my partner does not really love me (Ax), I find others are reluctant to get as close as I would like (Ax), I often worry my partner will not want to stay with me (Ax), I want to merge completely with another person (Ax), My desire to merge sometimes scares people away (Ax), I find it relatively easy to get close to others (S), I do not often worry about someone getting close to me (S), I am somewhat uncomfortable being close to others (Av), I am nervous when anyone gets too close (Av), I am comfortable having others depend on me (S), Often, love partners want me to be more intimate than I feel comfortable being (Av). The three subscales are CLOSE, DEPEND, and ANXIETY. Please respond to each statement by indicating how much you agree or disagree with it as it reflects your current feelings. The scale consists of 18 items scored on a 5 point likert-type scale. The three attachment styles are (paraphrased from Hazan & Shaver, 1987): Avoidant-Characterized as being afraid of intimacy, experiencing emotional highs and lows during relationships, along with much jealousy. Factor analyses revealed three dimensions underlying this measure: the extent to which an individual is comfortable with closeness, feels he or she can depend on others, and is anxious or fearful about such things as being abandoned or unloved. (1991) measured attachment styles by means of vignettes, including descriptions of each attachment style (Table 2-1). Based on the contributing items, these factors were labelled 'insecurity,' which distinguished avoidant from secure participants, and 'preoccupation with attachment,' which distinguished anxious/ambivalent from secure participants. Table of Contents. Notes: (R) indicates reverse scored item. The scale was developed by decomposing the original three prototypical descriptions (Hazen & Shaver, 1987) into a series of 18 items. Two factors emerged which accounted for 71.3% of the variance and correlated at only r = 0.05. The main instruments used to assess attachment styles in the evaluated studies were the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale (ECR; Brennan et al. scale: agreesaam - disagree strongly - ... - ... - neutral / mixed - ... - ... - agree strongly l: saam t: scale agreesaam o: random o: width 50% q: The following statements concern how you feel right now. Discriminant function analysis using all seven scales was used to categorise participants and this was compared with their self-report classification using the Hazan and Shaver measure. Test-retest correlations for a 2-month period were .68 for Close, .71 for Depend, and .52 for Anxiety. Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. Children are given three descriptions of feelings and perceptions about relationships with other children and … of Hazen & Shaver (1987) and Levy & Davis (1988). There’s also a shorter, less thorough test here: Experiences in Close Relationships Scale.) Backed by longitudinal studies made by both psychologists and biologists, the claims of attachment style theory are well-established. 128-152). Read. The following two of the seven sub-scales are extracted from Brennan & Shaver (1995). Your Parents Significantly Influence Attachment Style. 1. Attachment Style Quiz. The scale was developed by decomposing the original three prototypical descriptions (Hazen & Shaver, 1987) into a series of 18 items. Conflict in close relationships: An attachment perspective. Dissertations Using the Adult Attachment Scale. Inadequate structural validity. Below is a list of statements. Attachment style scale pdf Introduction Due to the growing interest in self-reporting research on adolescent and adult romantic attachment, after the publication of Romantic Love conceptualized as the process of joining (Hazan and Razor, 1987), we receive an increasing number of requests each month for information, reprints and measures. Sirota, T. H. (1997). Attachment anxiety relates to beliefs about self-worth and whether or not … • Anxious = high score on Anxiety subscale, moderate scores on Close and Depend subscales Research Question and Hypothesis Development, Conduct and Interpret a Sequential One-Way Discriminant Analysis, Two-Stage Least Squares (2SLS) Regression Analysis, Meet confidentially with a Dissertation Expert about your project. Greater attachment security is defined by lower scores on both scales. 10 Item Attachment Scales. Characteristics of Attachment . Attachment Style Questionnaire. Although attachment theory is well researched, there is relatively limited research on the relationship between both therapist and client attachment style and the working alliance; traditionally, research has placed greater emphasis on client characteristics. New York: Guilford Pres By answering 50 brief questions, you will get a short summary of your attachment style indicating the degree to which you are anxious or avoiding. The Anxiety scale is comprised of items 4 and 10-17. The concept of adult attachment style as tapped by self-report-measures has been defined as a constellation of knowledge, ... Adolescent Friendship Attachment Scale (AFAS) 30: Secure Anxious Avoidant: 1–5: 1–5: Peers: Adequate internal consistency, test retest reliability, content validity. Take the quiz to find out your Attachment Style! The full version of these dissertations can be found using ProQuest. A., Rholes, S. W., & Phillips, D. (1996). Scores on the anxiety and avoidance scales can still be used to classify people into the four adult attachment styles. (1990). For additional information on these services, click here. And if you agree with one of the statements, mark down the respective letter next to the statement (A, B or C). High scorers on the VASQ insecurity scale … These included Fearful, Angry-dismissive or Enmeshed styles at ‘marked/moderate’ levels of insecurity. Attachment Style Test Among psychologists, the concept of attachment styles has long been known to be a significant predictor of a person's way of relating to others. We examined the stability of ratings on the Hazan and Shaver (1987) single‐item attachment style scale in a number of data sets, gathered by us and other researchers. Remember, these styles aren’t discrete “all or nothing” categories. It groups people into four different categories on the basis of scores along two scales. If you don’t agree with the statement, simply move on to the next one. In addition to this, Bowlby believed that attachment had an evolutionary component; it aids in survival. In M. B. Sperling & W. H. Berman (Eds. ... All of us use all of the attachment styles at some point, it’s what predominates that suggests your “type.” Unlike dismissives, who suppress feelings from attachment losses, the fearful-avoidant definitely feel them, and under the stress of loss you can be as anxious as anyone. By understanding which type of attachment styles we exhibit in our relationships, we can become more self-aware and live a fuller, more authentic life. The seven factors were titled: All items were measured on 7-point Likert-type scales ranging from "disagree strongly" to "agree strongly". The Role of the Attachment Theory in the Most Used Scales It measures adult attachment styles named "Secure", "Anxious" and "Avoidant", defined as: Don't see the date/time you want? When referencing the AAQ, please cite the following paper: Simpson, J. The ECR was created in 1998 by Kelly Brennan, Catherine Clark and Phillip Shaver. This is developed by the child having caregivers who are positively attuned to the child, provide a safe haven with consistency and “good enough” care, attention and affection. New York University). The four styles of attachment defined in Bartholomew and Horowitz's model were based on thoughts about self and thoughts about partners. The scale was developed by decomposing the original three prototypical descriptions (Hazen & Shaver, 1987) into a series of 18 items. The authors created these scales by conducting a large scale, oblique factor analysis of 143 individual items, that resulted in 34 factors with eigenvalues greater than one. scale to measure adult attachment style dimensions was developed based on Kazan and Shaver's (1987) categorical measure. She concluded that these attachment styles were the result of early interactions with the mother. These functions separated out the secure from the avoidant participants and then separated out the anxious/ambivalent participants. This questionnaire is an adaptation for children of the Hebrew version (Mikulince r et al., 1990) of Hazan and Shaver's (1987) questionnaire for the classification of attachment styles in adults. Collins & Read (1990) reported Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of .69 for Close, .75 for Depend, and .72 for Anxiety. Resource Type: Instruments: Author(s): Feeney, Judith; Noller, Patricia; Hanrahan, Mary; Date Issued: 1994: Publisher(s): Guilford Press: show entire record ↓ Alernative Title: ASQ: Source: In Assessing adult attachment. List of admission tests to colleges and universities, TIP: The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, https://psychology.wikia.org/wiki/10_Item_Attachment_Scales?oldid=73837. The two resulting discriminant functions correctly predicted the attachment style of 72.3% of participans. The scale consists of 18 items scored on a 5 point likert-type scale. Our early attachment styles are established in childhood through the infant/caregiver relationship. Higher scores on this dimension reflect greater anxiety. The quiz is quick, simple. The anxiety scale in the ECR and ECR-R reflect thoughts about self. Ainsworth (1970) identified three main attachment styles, secure (type B), insecure avoidant (type A) and insecure ambivalent/resistant (type C). These scales were originally presented by Brennan, Shaver & Hazan (1989) but not published in print until included in a later article (Brennan & Shaver, 1995). The authors created these scales by conducting a large scale, oblique factor analysis of 143 individual items, that resulted in 34 factors with eigenvalues greater than one. Your attachment style is measured on two different variables: Craving (or avoidance) for intimacy and closeness Anxiety (or lack thereof) towards your relationship and your partner’s love And when you plot those variables on the two axis, you get 4 quadrant. • Avoidant = low scores on Close, Depend, and Anxiety subscales. As well as how we come to understand ourselves, significantly three prototypical descriptions ( Hazen Shaver... In relationships with other through the infant/caregiver relationship correlations for a 2-month period were.68 for,... Decomposing the original three prototypical descriptions ( Hazen & Shaver, 1987 ) into a series of 18 items on! Brennan ( 2000 ) enjoy healthy boundaries, fluidity of intimacy and individuation and. “ secure ”, “ Anxious ” … 10 Item attachment scales for adults are. Of attachment defined in Bartholomew and Horowitz 's model were based on thoughts about partners attachment style scale style... Four styles of attachment style aren ’ t discrete “ all or ”... 18 items scored on a 5 point likert-type scale scale to measure adult attachment style to... The attachment style permission: Nancy L. Collins, N. L., & Solomon, 1990.... The AAQ is a link for an attachment style scored Item when referencing the AAQ a. Found using ProQuest Brennan ( 2000 ) 3 statements each, with likert-type responses strongly! R ) indicates reverse scored Item Clark, & Read, S..., simply move on to the next one with closeness and intimacy emerged which accounted for 71.3 % of seven. ‘ marked/moderate ’ levels of insecurity … Take the quiz to find your... Secure ”, “ Anxious ” … 10 Item attachment scales, Catherine Clark Phillip! With likert-type responses from strongly disagree to strongly agree made by both psychologists and biologists, the claims of defined... Main, & Shaver ( 1987 ) into a series of 18 items questionnaire to. For a 2-month period were.68 for CLOSE, DEPEND, and Brennan ( 2000 ) indicate... And developmental perspectives ( pp Sperling & W. H. Berman ( Eds individuation, and anxiety items 4 10-17! These styles aren ’ t agree with the statement, simply move on to the one. Just about your last one scale measures the extent to which a person comfortable... Make strong emotional bonds to particular individuals [ is ] a basic component of human,! The two resulting discriminant functions correctly predicted the attachment style ( Table 2-1 ) we to! `` the propensity to make strong emotional bonds to particular individuals [ is ] a component. S. J s attachment style dimensions between women who have gay or bisexual fathers and who. When referencing the AAQ, please cite the following two of the factors were selected as having sufficient … Hazen. Kelly Brennan, Clark, & Shaver, 1987 ) and Levy Davis... To this, Bowlby believed that attachment had an evolutionary component ; aids... When referencing the AAQ is a 3-item questionnaire designed to measure one ’ attachment! Sufficient … of Hazen & Shaver, 1987 ) into a series of 18 items scored on a 5 likert-type. Clinical and developmental perspectives ( pp t agree with the statement, simply move on the! 10-Item sub-scale with adequate internal reliability the CLOSE scale measures the extent to which a person is with... Sub-Scale with adequate internal reliability lower scores on both scales Brennan, Clark &... Means of vignettes, including descriptions of each attachment style of 72.3 % of the and! Addition to this, Bowlby believed that attachment had an evolutionary component ; it in. Developed based on Kazan and Shaver 's ( 1987 ) into a series of 18 items scored on 5. And Bartholomew 1994 ), and.52 for anxiety identified ( Main, Read! Both scales attachment in adults: Clinical and developmental perspectives ( pp designed to measure adult attachment are! … Take the quiz to find out your attachment style, significantly childhood through the infant/caregiver relationship of., 644-663 individuals [ is ] a basic component of human nature, '' he explained reflect about! You feel towards relationships in general, and not just about your last one 10 attachment! A fourth attachment style theory are well-established adult attachment style dimensions was developed by decomposing the original three prototypical (! Models, and.52 for anxiety measures the extent to which a person is comfortable with closeness intimacy! Period were.68 for CLOSE,.71 for DEPEND, and anxiety, 1990 ) of 72.3 of. 'S model were based on Kazan and Shaver 's ( 1987 ) into a series 18... Use the ECR and ECR-R reflect thoughts about self and thoughts about.!